PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.72%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 52.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VUZI at -94.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-114.47%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.39%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -91.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-75.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 25.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
672.84%
AR growth well above VUZI's 32.97%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
34.30%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 27.73%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-260.29%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 89.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-94.92%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -1387.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.42%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 7.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.17%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -937.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-300.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-6.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
3.15%
Liquidation growth of 3.15% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-64.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -63119.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-5.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -20007.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-125.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 55.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
186.25%
We slightly raise equity while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-38.57%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.