PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -0.94%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
24.41%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 1173.04%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
395.91%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -350.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-7.66%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 147.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-123.51%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -102.41%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-90.78%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -439.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
413.27%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -820.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
115.00%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -108.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2.08%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 60.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -41.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
15.63%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -54.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-25.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.48%
Purchases growth of 5.48% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
28.52%
Liquidation growth of 28.52% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
100.00%
Growth well above VUZI's 199.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
48.94%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. VUZI's 186.84%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-27.18%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 68.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-93.45%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-43.47%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.