PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -44.72%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.13%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 399.31%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-252.82%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 345.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.89%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -51.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
57.02%
Well above VUZI's 98.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-1311.03%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 158.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-186.72%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -135.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
300.14%
AP growth well above VUZI's 275.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-95.74%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 304.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.09%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 22.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-75.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -223.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
1.74%
Acquisition growth of 1.74% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
35.83%
Some yoy expansion while VUZI is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-12.09%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-447.83%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
87.94%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -129.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
41.86%
We repay more while VUZI is negative at -223.06%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1360.00%
Issuance growth of 1360.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-32.53%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.