PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
65.06%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -7.59%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.29%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VUZI at -61.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
210.71%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -170.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
17.81%
SBC growth well above VUZI's 4.09%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
1474.69%
Well above VUZI's 483.44% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
160.13%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -20.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
66.78%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 96.41%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-109.83%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.18%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-1550.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -53.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.81%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -15.01%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-9.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 67.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
23.89%
Acquisition growth of 23.89% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-66.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1.09%
Liquidation growth of 1.09% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-7.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -100.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1387.27%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 67.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 81.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-99.54%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 100.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
48.22%
Buyback growth of 48.22% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.