PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
98.48%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 33.99%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
17.23%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 3540.41%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
673.91%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -102.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
21.94%
Less SBC growth vs. VUZI's 73.85%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
3.56%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -173.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
142.00%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -1460.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-92.69%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -135.35%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-78.45%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 81.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
110.34%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -88.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.88%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 12.06%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
15.30%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 42.63%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
88.74%
Acquisition growth of 88.74% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-78.69%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.55%
Liquidation growth of 43.55% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-149.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 3.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-158.51%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 42.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to VUZI's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-80.07%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.