PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-38.35%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-21.93%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 159.47%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.11%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 31.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-187.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -28.33%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
46.49%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. VUZI's 181.95%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
65.86%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -885.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-478.94%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 1079.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-726.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -1025.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
123.72%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -7.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-53.84%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 3.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
11.84%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -80.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-194.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.07%
Purchases growth of 16.07% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-11.63%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
190.38%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -255.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.73%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -80.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.01%
Buyback growth of 34.01% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.