PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -35.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.94%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 91.87%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
41.75%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VUZI's 8178.27%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-1.97%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 84.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-62.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -158.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-132.26%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -284.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-19.19%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 14.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
117.70%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -98.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
25.10%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 88.24%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
3.08%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -171.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-31.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -22.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
21.72%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -50.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-262.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
46.93%
Purchases growth of 46.93% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-31.75%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
21.28%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -93.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
77.61%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -50.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.63%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.95%
Buyback growth of 0.95% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.