PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.09%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 20.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-10.46%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 8.74%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-433.96%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.89%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -21.90%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-360.84%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -200.51%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-42.22%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -243.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
106.51%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 61.61%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-35.55%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 86.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
54.05%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -180.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-198.15%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-58.21%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
29.57%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 29.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
25.75%
Acquisition growth of 25.75% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
8.85%
Purchases growth of 8.85% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
33.46%
Liquidation growth of 33.46% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
253.57%
Growth well above VUZI's 38.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
128.41%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 29.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-169.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.