PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-13.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -8.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.52%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
148.59%
Deferred tax of 148.59% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-1.19%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -13.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
39.46%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -6.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-68.99%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 107.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
2045.71%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -19.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
101.91%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -472.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-38.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -64.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
22.36%
Growth of 22.36% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
4.31%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -9.63%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.36%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 77.57%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-158.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-19.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
69.60%
Liquidation growth of 69.60% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-446.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 84.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
106.04%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 77.57%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-20.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-99.74%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
28.47%
Buyback growth of 28.47% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.