PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-49.41%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 20.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VUZI at -1.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
13.47%
Some yoy growth while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.76%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 133.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -1303.73%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
161.49%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -226.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
2696.43%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -1588.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1041.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -297.90%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-75.84%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 69.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
17.61%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VUZI's 166.66%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-56.38%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -11.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
12.06%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -43.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
81.63%
Acquisition growth of 81.63% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
22.30%
Purchases growth of 22.30% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
49.81%
Liquidation growth of 49.81% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-76.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -696.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
165.94%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -43.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-251.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
21300.00%
Issuance growth of 21300.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
10.30%
Buyback growth of 10.30% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.