PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
126.90%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -84.89%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.33%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VUZI at -19.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
85.39%
Well above VUZI's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
17.17%
Less SBC growth vs. VUZI's 167.68%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
38.12%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -363.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-719.06%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 120.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-593.43%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -5.73%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
222.23%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -131.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
210.42%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -647.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
933.33%
Well above VUZI's 143.58%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
88.39%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -118.98%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-96.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -101.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
82.35%
Acquisition growth of 82.35% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-117.11%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
33.80%
Liquidation growth of 33.80% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
291.18%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -14.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-255.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -101.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
81.67%
Debt repayment growth of 81.67% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 445.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-44.15%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.