PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -32.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.91%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -2.72%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-156.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.93%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 69.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-170.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -24.06%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
178.56%
AR growth well above VUZI's 114.84%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
70.95%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -7.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-209.22%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 151.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-77.55%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -73.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2096.00%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -72.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-38.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -21.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.17%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 9.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.01%
Purchases growth of 13.01% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-22.57%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 45.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-20.78%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 9.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-250.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.93%
Buyback growth of 23.93% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.