PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.98%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 9.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.25%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -12.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-255.70%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.06%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -54.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.29%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 100.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-88.01%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -79.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
104.71%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -115.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.89%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -41.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-68.11%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 198.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
56.91%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -75.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-12.04%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 19.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.76%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -427.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.07%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.45%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -427.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
14.29%
Debt repayment growth of 14.29% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -99.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-21.50%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.