PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 38.24%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-9.77%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VUZI at -28.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
116.89%
Deferred tax of 116.89% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
16.45%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -56.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
464.53%
Well above VUZI's 66.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
55.34%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. VUZI's 158.36%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
147.66%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 85.42%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
40.40%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -245.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
845.16%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -122.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-69.19%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -92.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
132.50%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 20.27%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
13.03%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 57.57%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-123.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
8.59%
Liquidation growth of 8.59% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
29.43%
Growth well above VUZI's 46.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-2028.86%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 57.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
80.84%
Debt repayment growth of 80.84% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.