PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.78%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 4.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.48%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 26.47%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-40.47%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.57%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -10.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-131.45%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 221.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
340.87%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -101.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-43.61%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 288.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-208.83%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 111.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-64.29%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 104.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-211.98%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 200.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-40.03%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 28.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
10.31%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -3668.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.45%
Purchases growth of 22.45% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.91%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.48%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -2871.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
42.47%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -3668.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-75.10%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.51%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.