PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.26%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.48%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 19.81%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
310.84%
Deferred tax of 310.84% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.40%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -1.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-57.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -314.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-110.35%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -12584.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-104.17%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -157.03%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
79.79%
Lower AP growth vs. VUZI's 790.60%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-322.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -8461.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
78.07%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -67.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-18.72%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -51.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.39%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 59.82%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.75%
Purchases growth of 69.75% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-26.78%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-70.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 66.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
145.70%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 59.82%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-71.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
Buyback growth of 3.38% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.