PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.77%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 4.82%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.78%
Less D&A growth vs. VUZI's 57.08%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
27.52%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -2.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-3018.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 277.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
166.96%
AR growth well above VUZI's 213.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-515.40%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -39.46%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-139.05%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 106.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-39.91%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 182.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-284.30%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -94.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
40.94%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 36.76%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-15.14%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 36.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
23.60%
Purchases growth of 23.60% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-20.05%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
76.38%
Growth well above VUZI's 99.06%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-18.73%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 50.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
49.84%
Debt repayment growth of 49.84% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.28%
Buyback growth below 50% of VUZI's 73.17%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.