PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.71%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -21.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.31%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -3.16%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.57%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 16.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
224.24%
Well above VUZI's 53.71% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-137.34%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 86.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
97.03%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 10.66%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
127.05%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.72%
Well above VUZI's 9.71%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-7.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -1.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.22%
Lower CapEx growth vs. VUZI's 62.52%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.38%
Liquidation growth of 12.38% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-377.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -1557.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-81.16%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 63.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-233.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.80%
Buyback growth of 10.80% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.