PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.47%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -81.01%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-13.07%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 9.97%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -11.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-909.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 221.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-367.89%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 366.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4427.27%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -259.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
274.96%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -221.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-811.11%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 3356.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.13%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 23.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-3.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -14.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.32%
Purchases growth of 12.32% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
7.06%
Liquidation growth of 7.06% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-15.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -119.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
447.83%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -114.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
73.43%
Debt repayment growth of 73.43% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.