PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.74%
Net income growth similar to VUZI's 49.46%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
7.35%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -12.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -17.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
118.53%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -220.03%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
170.51%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -159.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-114.39%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 44.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-130.48%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 217.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.70%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -22.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
84.72%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -43.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 56.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.00%
Liquidation growth of 5.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
51.37%
Growth well above VUZI's 68.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-19.51%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 76.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-99.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.