PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-9.26%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 77.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.49%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -56.30%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.21%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 10.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
102.52%
Less working capital growth vs. VUZI's 869.63%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-187.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -104.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-106.32%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
112.65%
AP growth well above VUZI's 76.01%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.43%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -106.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
27.18%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 6.36%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-7.77%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 214.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.61%
Purchases growth of 14.61% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-11.21%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
12.81%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -7104.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
59.03%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 66.22%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-3.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.29%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.