PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.29%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -48.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.14%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 3.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.38%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -2.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4457.24%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -40.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-2127.28%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 875.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-8958.33%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 1886.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1276.93%
AP growth well above VUZI's 49.64%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
319.59%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -96.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-119.53%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 333.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-7.09%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 23.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-35.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -137.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.80%
Some yoy expansion while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-2.06%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
50.77%
Growth well above VUZI's 98.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
1237.80%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -6.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
178.64%
Debt repayment growth of 178.64% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.43%
Buyback growth of 5.43% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.