229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
146.54%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 36.75%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
5.81%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -4.87%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.98%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -5.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-262.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
129.48%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -60.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
119.78%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -36.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-131.48%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 912.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-217.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-565.23%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
11.65%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of VUZI's 14.14%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-1.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -73.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.13%
Purchases growth of 42.13% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
28.65%
Liquidation growth of 28.65% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-215.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -22.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
577.65%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -116.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-410.56%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.89%
Buyback growth of 5.89% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.