PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.79%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-13.60%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 22.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -72.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
39.48%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -19.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
43.04%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -73.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
199.07%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 80.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-18.92%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
19.60%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 352.14%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
89.65%
Well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-4.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -18.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-36.59%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.69%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-70.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -13.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
49.95%
Debt repayment growth of 49.95% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.71%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.