Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Negative net income growth while WLDS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.

Negative yoy D&A while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.

Deferred tax of 13.47% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.

Negative yoy SBC while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.

Negative yoy working capital usage while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.

AR growth of 161.49% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.

Inventory growth of 2696.43% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.

Negative yoy AP while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.

Negative yoy usage while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.

Growth of 17.61% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.

Negative yoy CFO while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.

CapEx growth of 12.06% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.

Acquisition growth of 81.63% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.

Purchases growth of 22.30% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.

We reduce yoy other investing while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.

We expand invests by 165.94% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.

We cut debt repayment yoy while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.

Issuance growth of 21300.00% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.