PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with WLDS at -27.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.91%
D&A growth of 4.91% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-156.90%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.93%
Negative yoy SBC while WLDS is 148.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-170.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with WLDS at -79.33%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
178.56%
AR growth while WLDS is negative at -500.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
70.95%
Inventory growth well above WLDS's 66.67%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-209.22%
Negative yoy AP while WLDS is 38.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-77.55%
Both reduce yoy usage, with WLDS at -24.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2096.00%
Negative yoy while WLDS is 2600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with WLDS at -236.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.17%
Some CapEx rise while WLDS is negative at -1300.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.01%
Purchases growth of 13.01% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-22.57%
We reduce yoy sales while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-20.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with WLDS at -1300.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-250.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.93%
Buyback growth of 23.93% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.