PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.37%
Net income growth of 39.37% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
8.21%
D&A growth of 8.21% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
479.58%
Deferred tax growth of 479.58% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
33.48%
SBC growth of 33.48% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
241.94%
A slight increase while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -23.51%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
74.94%
AR growth of 74.94% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
252.29%
Inventory growth of 252.29% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-32.88%
AP shrinks yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
75.14%
Growth of 75.14% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-100.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
71.97%
Positive CFO growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -42.22%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-55.35%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-18.76%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-21.53%
We liquidate less yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-195.83%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-144.79%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.20%
Issuance growth of 16.20% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.