229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
126.90%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 8.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-1.33%
D&A shrinks yoy while Consumer Electronics median is -1.33%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
85.39%
Deferred tax growth of 85.39% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
17.17%
SBC growth of 17.17% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
38.12%
A slight increase while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -84.68%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
-719.06%
AR shrinks yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-593.43%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Consumer Electronics median is -97.54%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
222.23%
AP growth of 222.23% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
210.42%
Some yoy usage while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -72.90%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
933.33%
Under 50% of Consumer Electronics median of 8.30% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
88.39%
Positive CFO growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -45.00%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-96.19%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
82.35%
Acquisition growth of 82.35% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-117.11%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
33.80%
Proceeds growth of 33.80% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
291.18%
Growth of 291.18% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-255.20%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
81.67%
Debt repayment growth of 81.67% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-44.15%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.