229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.51%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 4.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-9.77%
D&A shrinks yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
116.89%
Deferred tax growth of 116.89% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
16.45%
SBC growth of 16.45% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
464.53%
Working capital of 464.53% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
55.34%
Under 50% of Consumer Electronics median of 21.92% if it’s negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential red flags in receivables if growth is too large or out of line with revenue.
147.66%
A moderate inventory rise while Consumer Electronics is negative at -50.66%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
40.40%
AP growth of 40.40% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
845.16%
Some yoy usage while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -77.17%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
-69.19%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Consumer Electronics median is -72.59%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
132.50%
Positive CFO growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -49.34%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
13.03%
CapEx growth under 50% of Consumer Electronics median of 11.20% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-123.27%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
8.59%
Proceeds growth of 8.59% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
29.43%
We expand slightly while Consumer Electronics median is negative at -30.64%. Peter Lynch might see peers taking a more cautious approach on these uncertain or intangible areas.
-2028.86%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Electronics median is -17.55%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
80.84%
Debt repayment growth of 80.84% while Consumer Electronics median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-3.70%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.