PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.43%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 12.96%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.35%
D&A growth of 6.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.80%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is -1.04%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
365.24%
Under 50% of Technology median of 74.32% or exceeding it in the negative sense. Jim Chanos would suspect a bigger working capital drain if growth is not justified by sales.
-211.14%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-43.23%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
51.15%
Under 50% of Technology median of 23.07% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential liquidity warnings or overly aggressive use of trade credit.
454.53%
Under 50% of Technology median of 19.97% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would sense potential red flags or large tie-ups in these rarely monitored accounts.
-8950.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -26.54%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
16.35%
Operating cash flow growth under 50% of Technology median of 39.20%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about significantly weaker cash inflow vs. peers.
-12.73%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.50%
Purchases growth of 18.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
13.67%
Proceeds growth of 13.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-962.50%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
73.91%
Investing flow of 73.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-198.16%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.62%
Buyback growth of 18.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.