229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.69%
Net income growth at 75-90% of Technology median of 7.51%. John Neff would advise further margin or cost improvements to match peers.
-7.53%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
58.41%
Deferred tax growth of 58.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.67%
Working capital of 35.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.81%
Inventory growth of 133.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
16.16%
Operating cash flow growth near Technology median of 16.81%. Charlie Munger would find it typical for this stage in the industry cycle.
31.96%
We have some CapEx expansion while Technology median is negative at -1.79%. Peter Lynch would see peers possibly pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.69%
Purchases growth of 86.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-35.10%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
10.62%
Growth of 10.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
139.73%
Investing flow of 139.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.20%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-15.67%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.