229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.79%
Net income growth of 52.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-22.53%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
535.00%
Deferred tax growth of 535.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.57%
Working capital of 86.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Inventory growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
132.24%
Positive CFO growth while Technology median is negative at -27.22%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-9.44%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.19%
Purchases growth of 74.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
57.99%
Proceeds growth of 57.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
4.72%
Growth of 4.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
190.03%
Under 50% of Technology median of 17.17% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.61%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
66.21%
Buyback growth of 66.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.