PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.82%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 4.76%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-2.55%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.76%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
88.19%
Deferred tax growth of 88.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2840.22%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.94%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
800.00%
Growth of 800.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-107.98%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
47.44%
CapEx growth of 47.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.97%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-53.10%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-42.98%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-92.77%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
688.79%
Issuance growth of 688.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
90.95%
Buyback growth of 90.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.