PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-57.50%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 10.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-11.63%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
24.36%
Deferred tax growth of 24.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.79%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-170.90%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-69.05%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
833.33%
AP growth of 833.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
25.81%
Growth of 25.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-47.93%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-104.59%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 21.24%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-220.13%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is -6.78%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.75%
Purchases growth of 86.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-30.88%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
126.47%
Growth of 126.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
700.00%
Investing flow of 700.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
760.00%
Issuance growth of 760.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.