PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
717.65%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
7.89%
D&A growth of 7.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-212.89%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Working capital of 48.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
169.47%
AR growth of 169.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
73.08%
Inventory growth of 73.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-400.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-212.82%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
225.14%
Growth of 225.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
935.29%
CFO growth of 935.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
67.69%
CapEx growth of 67.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-330.00%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-87.33%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-211.11%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-257.81%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is -1.37%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.