PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.51%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.30%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
11.27%
D&A growth of 11.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
133.33%
Deferred tax growth of 133.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
307.95%
Working capital of 307.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-561.01%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
20.70%
Inventory growth of 20.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
381.34%
AP growth of 381.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
76.61%
Growth of 76.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-131.11%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
70.45%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-48.56%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is -7.74%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.23%
Purchases growth of 36.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
358.29%
Proceeds growth of 358.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
417.00%
Growth of 417.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
127.44%
Slight expansions while Technology median is negative at -16.23%. Peter Lynch wonders if peers are more cautious or have fewer investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
651.83%
Issuance growth of 651.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.