PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.10%
Net income growth of 41.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
27.59%
D&A growth of 27.59% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-75.44%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.52%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
335.29%
AR growth of 335.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-483.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
291.18%
AP growth of 291.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-36.36%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
79.03%
Growth of 79.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-533.33%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 6.98%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-93.33%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.62%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
111.24%
Proceeds growth of 111.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
120.85%
Investing flow of 120.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.17%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.