PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-215.00%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
82.61%
D&A growth of 82.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
94.92%
Deferred tax growth of 94.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.99%
Working capital of 127.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
96.56%
AR growth of 96.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
57.84%
Inventory growth of 57.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
129.31%
AP growth of 129.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
94.92%
Growth of 94.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-93.75%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
127.79%
Positive CFO growth while Technology median is negative at -10.45%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
36.73%
CapEx growth of 36.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.04%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-61.50%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
54.43%
Growth of 54.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-179.89%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.71%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.