229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-187.50%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
86.36%
D&A growth of 86.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
411.11%
Deferred tax growth of 411.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
276.69%
Working capital of 276.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
391.53%
AR growth of 391.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
488.00%
Inventory growth of 488.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-353.57%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
1500.00%
Growth of 1500.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
196.12%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-83.33%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-98.18%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
139.29%
Proceeds growth of 139.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-16.67%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-21.74%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is -1.30%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-1600.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
450.00%
Issuance growth of 450.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.