PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.37%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-20.83%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
325.00%
Deferred tax growth of 325.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-184.40%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
57.14%
Inventory growth of 57.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-99.26%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-66.67%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-87.04%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-67.29%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
63.16%
CapEx growth of 63.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
77.97%
Acquisition growth of 77.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
29.85%
Purchases growth of 29.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
16.11%
Proceeds growth of 16.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
55.56%
Growth of 55.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
295.15%
Investing flow of 295.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.85%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.