PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.16%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 3.74%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
19.05%
D&A growth under 50% of Technology median of 3.14%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
14.63%
Deferred tax growth of 14.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.85%
Working capital of 109.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
43.75%
AR growth of 43.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.70%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-40.00%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
50.00%
Growth of 50.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
283.61%
CFO growth of 283.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
59.26%
CapEx growth of 59.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-49.50%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
12.45%
Purchases growth of 12.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-26.94%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
150.00%
Growth of 150.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-3266.67%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.