PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.12%
Net income growth of 15.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
14.00%
D&A growth of 14.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
807.69%
Deferred tax growth of 807.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-11.90%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
150.54%
Working capital of 150.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-148.51%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-122.50%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
151.40%
AP growth of 151.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
119.34%
Growth of 119.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-166.67%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
905.60%
CFO growth of 905.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-22.80%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-59.87%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
188.00%
Growth of 188.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-78.43%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.