229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.51%
Net income growth of 10.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
14.81%
D&A growth of 14.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-252.38%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
4.62%
SBC growth of 4.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
323.60%
Working capital of 323.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
52.90%
AR growth of 52.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-120.93%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-2.63%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-161.57%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
400.00%
Growth of 400.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
38.22%
CFO growth of 38.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
19.03%
CapEx growth of 19.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.32%
Purchases growth of 36.32% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
25.36%
Proceeds growth of 25.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-28.57%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
127.63%
Investing flow of 127.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.83%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.