PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.97%
Net income growth of 5.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
14.53%
D&A growth of 14.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-1268.57%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
6.02%
SBC growth of 6.02% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
8114.63%
Working capital of 8114.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-8090.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
119.89%
Inventory growth of 119.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
474.90%
AP growth of 474.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
559.71%
Growth of 559.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
40.00%
Growth of 40.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
225.13%
CFO growth of 225.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-27.88%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.44%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
32.84%
Proceeds growth of 32.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-2900.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-45.26%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.55%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.