PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.04%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -6.10%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
61.88%
D&A growth of 61.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
247.79%
Deferred tax growth of 247.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
21.65%
SBC growth of 21.65% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
922.92%
Working capital of 922.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
79.59%
AR growth of 79.59% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-300.60%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
204.66%
AP growth of 204.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
546.99%
Growth of 546.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41%
CFO growth of 156.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
29.88%
CapEx growth of 29.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.39%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-9.75%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-750.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-213.49%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.24%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.