PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.73%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.48%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.12%
D&A growth of 0.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-27.12%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
0.52%
SBC growth of 0.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-2071.59%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-138.88%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-315.24%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
96.99%
AP growth of 96.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-95.71%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.40%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
12.31%
CapEx growth of 12.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-860.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
5.58%
Purchases growth of 5.58% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
16.57%
Proceeds growth of 16.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-131.71%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
54.68%
Investing flow of 54.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.85%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.