PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.21%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.13%
D&A growth of 3.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
35.86%
Deferred tax growth of 35.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
4.02%
SBC growth of 4.02% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-1600.00%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-124.16%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-19.80%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
98.52%
AP growth of 98.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-143.48%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.25%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-63.59%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-897.06%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-67.53%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-8.01%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
207.14%
Growth of 207.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-289.20%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.59%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
72.18%
Buyback growth of 72.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.