PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
112.87%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -4.56%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
30.78%
D&A growth of 30.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
372.24%
Deferred tax growth of 372.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
16.54%
SBC growth of 16.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
251.10%
Working capital of 251.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
111.47%
AR growth of 111.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
30.08%
Inventory growth of 30.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
6.31%
AP growth of 6.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
1331.82%
Growth of 1331.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.51%
CFO growth of 154.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
15.24%
CapEx growth of 15.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
99.20%
Acquisition growth of 99.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
20.46%
Purchases growth of 20.46% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-59.24%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
622.22%
Growth of 622.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-806.21%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.88%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
70.41%
Buyback growth of 70.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.