PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
65.06%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -12.29%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-5.29%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
210.71%
Deferred tax growth of 210.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
17.81%
SBC growth of 17.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
1474.69%
Working capital of 1474.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
160.13%
AR growth of 160.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
66.78%
Inventory growth of 66.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-109.83%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-1550.00%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.81%
CFO growth of 103.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-9.51%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
23.89%
Acquisition growth of 23.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-66.08%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
1.09%
Proceeds growth of 1.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-7.50%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-1387.27%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-99.54%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
48.22%
Buyback growth of 48.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.