PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
98.48%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -4.98%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
17.23%
D&A growth of 17.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
673.91%
Deferred tax growth of 673.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
21.94%
SBC growth of 21.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
3.56%
Working capital of 3.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
142.00%
AR growth of 142.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-92.69%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-78.45%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
110.34%
Growth of 110.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.88%
CFO growth of 68.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
15.30%
CapEx growth of 15.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
88.74%
Acquisition growth of 88.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-78.69%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
43.55%
Proceeds growth of 43.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-149.29%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-158.51%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-80.07%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.